STRK is fairly valued. Monitor for entry. moderate liquidity entering the market. no research into tokenomics = high risk of rug pull. (Layer 2 eth project?) Theoretical idea ------ A $500 account risking 2% Buys 1,000 shares of STRK at $0.046-$0.036 = ~$36-$46 stop-loss set to $0.026 = -$10~ Just below yearly low (black level) TP1 - 3R (sells 40%) - Daily Inv.FS resistance level. TP2 - 4R (sells 40%) - Weekly Inv.BS & Inv.FS resistance levels. TP3 - 9R (sells remaining 20%) Weekly Inv.FS resistance level.

Fairly Valued, moderate liquidity, high dilution risk - with ZERO effort to learn about founder, white paper, or tokenomics in general. Price just gained a monthly timeframe FrontSide support level. -- expectation: Price action beings to create a low angle accumulation trend on higher timeframe. -- Lower Timeframes need to create daily support ladders breaking distribution trends. Looking for support on lower timeframe Weekly FrontSide support (Grey) + Daily FrontSide support (Red) are the best candidates to support higher timeframe expectation. If those support levels fail, distribution may be stopped by the yearly low (black) level. ** T.A explained ** Basics: Ranges = two or more consecutive color candles. There are two types of ranges - accumulation and distribution. A single candle is a range on a lower timeframe. We only look at the first and last candle in each range. DISTRIBUTION RANGES DEFINED: BackSide (BS) Candle - First distribution candle in a distribution range. Expectation = strong reaction to price. long wicks reaching to or away from level. FrontSide (FS) Candle - Last distribution candle in a distribution range. Expectation = reversal, create a trend in the opposite direction. Distribution candles are used as support. ACCUMULATION RANGES DEFINED: Inverse BS (Inv.BS) - First Accumulation candle in an accumulation range. Expectation. = strong reaction to price. long wicks reaching to or away from level. Inverse FS (Inv.FS) - Last accumulation candle in an accumulation range. Expectation = reversal, create a trend in the opposite direction. Accumulation candles are used as resistance. Horizontal Ray tool on BS & FS levels are default support levels when dashed lines, tested when dotted lines and resistance when solid lines. Horizontal Ray tool on Inverse BS & Inverse FS levels default as resistance and shown with a dashed line, tested when 1x dotted line, and support when solid line. The inverse is true for the Inv. BS Inv. FS levels, they are resistance as dashed lines, tested as dotted and support as solid lines. Monthly timeframe is color pink weekly grey daily is red 4hr is orange 1hr is yellow 15min is blue 5min is green if they are shown. strength favors the higher timeframe.

Even though NASDAQ:STRK is dumping horribly to its all-time low of ~$0.036 (down >99% from ATH $3.66–$4.41 in 2024), the StarkWare team + investors (VCs) are still making bank because: - Huge allocations: Early Contributors ~20% (2B STRK), Investors ~18.2% (1.82B #STRK), StarkWare ~10.8% → total ~49% of supply for insiders/team/VCs (per official tokenomics). - They received tokens at extremely low prices (near 0). Gradual unlocks until 2027 (monthly ~127M STRK, e.g., Jan/Feb/Apr 2026 unlocks of 127M each) → they can sell at any price and still make massive profits (even at $0.036, it's dozens or hundreds of times their initial cost). 1. Adoption is disastrous – "Fake" volume, DAU horrendously low TVL: ~$258.82M (down -2.12% in 24h; DeFiLlama). Compare: Base >$4B+, Arbitrum much higher. - DEX Volume 24h: ~$9-10M – sounds big but Chain Fees 24h only ~$4,757–$10K (very low, proving no real value generation). App Fees 24h: ~$88K. - Perps Volume 24h: ~$395M (30d ~$11.8B) – mostly mercenary farming from incentives, not organic activity (fees captured are tiny compared to notional volume). - DAU (Daily Active Users/Unique Addresses): ~2,000–4,000 (Dune/Starknet Foundation data); broader metrics (e.g., TokenTerminal) show ~50K, but still pathetic vs. Base ~500K+, Arbitrum ~170K+. Solana once trolled Starknet with "only 8 DAU" (old number, but the spirit is spot on: activity is weak compared to market cap/FDV). Bitcoin staking makes up a huge chunk of TVL (~passive wrapped BTC, not vibrant DeFi/gaming). 2. Tokenomics nightmare – Endless unlocks + dumping Current STRK price: ~$0.036–$0.038 USD (all-time low hit ~$0.036 on March 19, 2026; down ~5–8% in recent 24h across sources like CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko). - ATH: ~$3.66 (2024) → down >99%. - Market cap: ~$206–$212M. - Circulating supply: ~5.65B STRK (max 10B). - Ongoing unlocks: monthly from VC/team/early contributors (vesting until 2027) → constant selling pressure (e.g., upcoming April 2026 unlock). 3. Community: Basically non-existent Social media (X/Twitter) is full of shills from project/ecosystem accounts (@StarknetEco, etc.), critics get blocked/muted or ignored. ****Worst-case scenario (highly plausible if no turnaround): Community turns its back → loses all users/devs. - Incentives dry up → real volume collapses, TVL drops below $100M. - Broader ETH/BTC bear market → alt L2s die off. - STRK price: Short-term (2026) could hit $0.01–$0.02 (another 50–70% loss). Medium-term (2027+): If StarkWare doesn't fix reliability + adoption, drops to $0.005 or lower → zombie coin (still exists but dead volume, market cap under $50–100M). - Extreme worst: StarkWare pivots/abandons → price near 0.

Even though STRK is dumping horribly to its all-time low of ~$0.036 (down >99% from ATH $3.66–$4.41 in 2024), the StarkWare team + investors (VCs) are still making bank because: Huge allocations: Early Contributors ~20% (2B STRK), Investors ~18.2% (1.82B STRK), StarkWare ~10.8% → total ~49% of supply for insiders/team/VCs (per official tokenomics). They received tokens at extremely low prices (near 0). Gradual unlocks until 2027 (monthly ~127M STRK, e.g., Jan/Feb/Apr 2026 unlocks of 127M each) → they can sell at any price and still make massive profits (even at $0.036, it's dozens or hundreds of times their initial cost). They raised hundreds of millions in VC rounds earlier, now dumping unlocked tokens → perfect exit liquidity, while retail holders get wrecked. 1. Adoption is disastrous – "Fake" volume, DAU horrendously low TVL: ~$258.82M (down -2.12% in 24h; DeFiLlama). Compare: Base >$4B+, Arbitrum much higher. DEX Volume 24h: ~$9-10M – sounds big but Chain Fees 24h only ~$4,757–$10K (very low, proving no real value generation). App Fees 24h: ~$88K. Perps Volume 24h: ~$395M (30d ~$11.8B) – mostly mercenary farming from incentives, not organic activity (fees captured are tiny compared to notional volume). DAU (Daily Active Users/Unique Addresses): ~2,000–4,000 (Dune/Starknet Foundation data); broader metrics (e.g., TokenTerminal) show ~50K, but still pathetic vs. Base ~500K+, Arbitrum ~170K+. Solana once trolled Starknet with "only 8 DAU" (old number, but the spirit is spot on: activity is weak compared to market cap/FDV). Bitcoin staking makes up a huge chunk of TVL (~passive wrapped BTC, not vibrant DeFi/gaming). 2. Tokenomics nightmare – Endless unlocks + dumping Current STRK price: ~$0.036–$0.038 USD (all-time low hit ~$0.036 on March 19, 2026; down ~5–8% in recent 24h across sources like CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko). ATH: ~$3.66 (2024) → down >99%. Market cap: ~$206–$212M. Circulating supply: ~5.65B STRK (max 10B). Ongoing unlocks: monthly from VC/team/early contributors (vesting until 2027) → constant selling pressure (e.g., upcoming April 2026 unlock). 3. Community: Basically non-existent Social media (X/Twitter) is full of shills from project/ecosystem accounts (@StarknetEco , etc.), critics get blocked/muted or ignored. Real sentiment: Negative due to repeated outages (e.g., Jan 2026 revert 18 mins; others in 2025-2026), weak adoption → genuine community is thin, mostly mercenary farmers and heavy bagholders. ****Worst-case scenario (highly plausible if no turnaround): Community turns its back → loses all users/devs. Incentives dry up → real volume collapses, TVL drops below $100M. Broader ETH/BTC bear market → alt L2s die off. STRK price: Short-term (2026) could hit $0.01–$0.02 (another 50–70% loss). Medium-term (2027+): If StarkWare doesn't fix reliability + adoption, drops to $0.005 or lower → zombie coin (still exists but dead volume, market cap under $50–100M). Extreme worst: StarkWare pivots/abandons → price near 0.

Starknet Who’s farming this narrative pump and who’s actually trading the chart? After the recent mainnet and ecosystem headlines, according to the market there’s fresh attention on L2 names and Starknet is back in rotation. Today we saw a fast spike into that orange supply zone and an equally fast rejection - classic “news gets you in, levels decide if you stay.” On the 4H chart price just tapped into resistance around the upper orange band while RSI is stretched near overbought and curling down. Volume on the push up was strong, but this first touch looks more like profit taking than a clean breakout, so for now I lean short term pullback before any serious attempt higher. My base plan: I want a dip back into the green demand area to see if buyers defend it. If we hold that zone and RSI cools off, I’ll look for a long toward the mid black zone and then a retest of the orange highs ✅ If price loses the green block and closes below it, I assume bulls fumbled the bag and I’ll stand aside or look for a deeper fade. I might be wrong, but chasing right into resistance usually ends with funding your broker’s weekend.

STRK ▪️Date: February 21, 2026 ▪️Project: StarkNet ▪️Ticker: STRK ▪️Price: $0.0462 ▪️Market Cap: $251,641,626 ▪️Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV): $461,932,027 ▪️Total Value Locked (TVL): $456,510,874.90 ➡️ Project Description StarkNet is a decentralized Layer 2 network for Ethereum that uses ZK-STARK technology to scale computations without compromising security or decentralization. The project solves the problem of high fees and low speed on Ethereum, enabling developers to build complex dApps at low cost. Its mission is to make Ethereum scalable for mass adoption with a focus on security and performance. Unique Advantages: STARK provers for ZK-proofs enable high throughput (thousands of TPS), low fees, and EVM compatibility via the Cairo language. Unlike Optimistic Rollups, StarkNet offers fast finality without a challenge period and better privacy. Uniqueness: Addresses Ethereum's scalability issue (15-30 TPS, high gas fees). The L2 solution market is valued at $50 billion TVL (2026) with growth potential to $200 billion. Audience: over 1 million unique addresses, 50k daily active users. Growth drivers: DeFi, NFT, and gaming integrations. Team: StarkWare Industries founded in 2018 by Eli Ben-Sasson (Technion professor, ZK-STARK pioneer), Uri Kolodner, and Michael Riabzev. Strong academic background in cryptography, successes in ZK technology, but criticism for token launch delays in 2024. Weaknesses: Dependence on Ethereum, network outages in 2025, slow decentralization progress (30% as of 2026). TVL $456M, 80+ dApps, but lagging behind leaders like Arbitrum. ➡️ Technology Analysis Innovation: ZK-STARK-based architecture scales computations off-chain with on-chain proofs. Differs from zkSync (ZK-SNARK) with greater cryptographic security and quantum resistance. The Cairo language reduces costs by 10-100x compared to Ethereum L1. Development Activity: GitHub: 500+ commits/month, 100 active contributors, critical bugs fixed within 24 hours, open source with excellent documentation. Sector: L2 Scaling. Competitors: ▪️ zkSync Era (ZK) — TVL $1B ▪️ Polygon zkEVM (POL) — TVL $800M ▪️ Linea (LINEA) — TVL $500M ▪️ Scroll (SCR) — TVL $400M ▪️ Taiko (TKO) — TVL $200M Differentiation: Quantum-safe provers and native privacy, but lags in TVL ($456M vs zkSync $1B). Conclusion: Strong technology with high development activity, but low market share (10% of L2 sector). ➡️ Market and Competitors Market Size: Ethereum scalability — $50B TVL market, relevance growing with DeFi projected at $200B in 2026. Competitors: ▪️ zkSync (TVL $1B, focus on EVM compatibility) ▪️ Polygon zkEVM (TVL $800M, Polygon ecosystem integrations) ▪️ Linea (TVL $500M, ConsenSys support) ▪️ Scroll (TVL $400M, fast decentralization) ▪️ Taiko (TVL $200M, Bitcoin integrations) Partnerships: Integrations with LayerZero and Solana. Competitors growing faster (zkSync +50% YoY). Potential: In a bull market, L2s could reach $10 trillion market cap. Profitability: Project generates $5M monthly from fees but loses $2M on development. Market cap $456M appears undervalued at 10x P/S vs competitors at 20x. Conclusion: Promising market, but StarkNet lags in TVL and growth. ➡️ Investors and Partnerships Rounds: ▪️ Seed (2018) — $6M (Vitalik Buterin, Naval Ravikant) ▪️ Series A (2019) — $30M (Paradigm) ▪️ Series B (2021) — $50M (Sequoia) ▪️ Series C (2022) — $100M (Greenoaks, Coatue) ▪️ Series D (2022) — $100M (Tiger Global) Total raised: $287M. Investors: Paradigm, Sequoia, a16z — top-tier funds with 100x return history (Paradigm in Solana 500x). 1-4 year vesting — positive for tokenomics. Analysis: All investors are top-tier, strong stability signal. Conclusions: Strong investors indicate high potential with historical 50x growth in bull markets. ➡️ Tokenomics ▪️Max Supply: 10 billion ▪️Circulating: 4.56 billion ▪️Total Supply: 10 billion ▪️Market Cap: $456M ▪️Inflation: 5% annual ▪️Distribution: ▪️ Private Sale: 10% ▪️ Public Sale: 5% ▪️ Team: 20% ▪️ Foundation: 30% ▪️ Staking/Mining: 20% ▪️ Ecosystem: 15% ▪️Chart: Private 10%, Public 5%, Team 20%, Foundation 30%, Staking 20%, Ecosystem 15% ▪️Supply/Demand: Unlocks increase supply by 500M/year. Demand from staking (10% APY) and 1% fee burn. ▪️Unlock Schedule: 2026 — 100M tokens monthly ($10M at $0.10), 20% pressure from $50M trading volume. ▪️Mechanisms: Staking, burning. Real use in DeFi. ▪️Comparison: zkSync (21B max supply, more inflation); Polygon (deflationary). ▪️Conclusion: Balanced tokenomics, but unlocks create pressure. ➡️ Community and Social Activity Twitter: 500k followers, 10k interactions per post. Discord: 200k, high activity. Telegram: 100k. Sentiment neutral-positive. Metric: 7/10 — average audience with good engagement. ➡️ News, Events, Announcements ▪️ Dec 22, 2025 — S-two prover ▪️ Dec 2, 2025 — Integration ▪️ Feb 1, 2026 — LayerZero live ▪️ Feb 10, 2026 — Roadmap ▪️ Jan 15, 2026 — Solana access ▪️ Jan 2026 — BTC staking ▪️ Feb 2026 — Quantum upgrade Impact: Positive for TVL (+$300M), but price under unlock pressure. Bullish market, L2 sector growing. 💡 Conclusion Overall rating: 7/10 — strong technology and team, but lags in adoption. Recommendation: Include in portfolio for medium-term investors with high risk (5-10% allocation). 10x potential in altseason, target market cap $5 billion.

STRK. Still hoping this thing suddenly moons after the airdrop hype? While the ecosystem keeps dropping “growth” headlines, the market is clearly focused on unlocks and fresh supply, and you can see it in the price action – every bounce gets sold almost instantly. According to industry sources, funds are still rotating into majors, so small caps like STRK are left to fend for themselves. On the 4H chart we’re in a clean downtrend, and the last bounce stalled right under the main volume node around 0.050–0.052 – classic supply zone. RSI just rolled down from overbought back under 50, confirming fading momentum, so I’m leaning short, expecting continuation of the grind lower rather than a sudden reversal. I might be wrong, but right now STRK looks more like a falling knife than a hidden gem. My base case ✅ short bias while price stays below 0.052 with targets toward 0.046 first and then 0.043 if the selloff accelerates. If buyers suddenly punch through 0.052 and hold above that on volume, the script flips and we can easily squeeze into 0.056–0.058 where the next heavy resistance sits. I’m watching for weak retests of 0.050 to build shorts, and I’ll step aside fast if that level starts acting as firm support.

STRK has pulled back 57% from its January high, showing clear bearish momentum. Price is approaching key zones that could attract bulls — or trigger further breakdowns. 🔻 Support Zones $0.0463 – A critical confluence zone: Rejection point on Feb 5 Midpoint of last week’s long tail May act as support ahead of Sunday's token unlock, which increases circulating supply. $0.0410 – If $0.0463 fails, bulls’ stops lie here (Feb 6 low). $0.0400 – Psychological level; no strong structure below but could trigger a short-term bounce. 🔺 Resistance Zones $0.0534–$0.0549 – Initial supply zone: Created by Feb 5 bearish candle void Distribution zone on Feb 2 $0.0597 – Feb 3 swing high. Break above may trigger stop runs. $0.0618 / $0.0639 / $0.0659 – Layered bearish voids from late January. Expect increased selling pressure here. ⚠️ Outlook Bearish short-term trend Watch how price reacts at $0.0463 Sunday’s token unlock could be a volatility catalyst Bulls need to reclaim $0.0549+ to shift momentum 📌 Levels in Focus Support: $0.0463 → $0.0410 → $0.0400 Resistance: $0.0534 → $0.0549 → $0.0597 → $0.0618–$0.0659

#STRK / USDT (1H) NASDAQ:STRK is still holding within the descending channel on the hourly chart. A break below the lower boundary could trigger heavy selling pressure. However, there is a bullish divergence expecting an upward bounce soon. DM for more details!

Price has reached one of the targets and then resumed a sharp sell-off. At the same time, RSI maintains a higher-low structure, creating a clear divergence with price action. The $0.36 target becomes relevant again only after the start of a broader altcoin season. I don’t see attractive long opportunities until price reclaims and holds above $0.10. For now, the 1.0 Fibonacci extension from the low remains the key reference — Fibonacci levels are currently the most relevant framework for STRK.